![]() |
||||||||
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software NX6 Improved with Synchronous Technology With NX6's improved technology, rework for designers is fast becoming a thing of the past. | Published January 1, 2009
Siemens PLM Software’s latest release of NX predictably incorporates the company’s Synchronous Technology. What was not so easily predicted is that the combination in NX6 results in a much more dynamic way of creating, editing, and interacting with geometry. Synchronous Technology (ST), as you remember, enables the user to work with geometry history free, retaining feature information and allowing you to work with your part’s form on the fly — no recalculation required. On top of this, you have the ability to define relationships between geometric features, dimensions, and other parameters without needing expert knowledge of how a part or assembly was constructed. We must note that within the context of NX, Synchronous Technology is being implemented as Design Freedom. This actually makes sense because, in comparison to Solid Edge (see DE October 2008), the way the technology has been built into NX differs greatly.
ST in the NX environment does not split your working practices. Because the last few releases (NX5 in particular) have had more direct editing tools built into NX, the system is more capable of integrating this new technology and making it usable with existing tools. Essentially, the difference is that you can flip between history and history free mode on the fly, within a part, so you can either keep a trail of everything you do in serial sequence or not. You directly manipulate geometry and features like holes, blends, and chamfers. These features are not stored in a traditional feature history tree. As you edit, the system uses a new tool called Active Selection to find common geometry, so edits to multiple features can be made in a single operation. This allows you to edit features en masse, but with some intelligence, so that only features within your field of work are edited. This way, you won’t edit a small hole on the other side of a large part by accident. Shells, however, do appear in a feature tree. This allows you to maintain the wall thickness as you work with the ST-based editing tools, so you can take additional geometry, paste it into your part, and then use the shell face to create and maintain the uniform thickness: your selection is the face that is integral to the part.
This cutting and pasting of geometry is impressive — referred to as scrapbook modeling. Whereas you might be able to use basic forms of copy-and-paste in other systems, the flexibility of ST makes this really usable. Geometric features can be cut and pasted within parts or between parts, so features that need to match at interfaces can be created quickly indeed — and they remain intelligent, so relationships are copied and moved as well. This might be subtle, but how often do you find that you are recreating the same type of geometry in different parts — even within the same part — with no real way of reusing that data on the fly? Now, you can. This is really the crux of ST in NX. The system has never been as reliant on history based modeling processes as other systems, so developers have been able to integrate this new feature-based but history-less way of modeling into the core of the system. User interaction
This release extends the use of “on model” working further in several areas. The radial toolbars have been greatly extended. Menus can be accessed in full (using the ALT key), multiple layers of context-sensitive commands are available at the cursor and, when combined with the new ways of working introduced with ST, you have one extremely intuitive system. You can now switch to Full Screen mode, which with the rail-based toolbars, new at cursor menus, makes a great deal of sense and gives you a huge working area. Alongside this, the new TrueShade mode displays your geometry with realistic materials, shadows, a range of preset lighting conditions, and reflective floors, all without the need for high-end graphics. Simulation
One of the core underlying updates to simulation is the way that the various components have been restructured for reuse. When conducting simulation tasks, you now create three files, which are linked back to the originating data. The SIM file represents the loading and boundary conditions, the FEM file contains all of the work you do to clean up the model, while the POST file is where you store everything in terms of result extraction and visualization. What this means is that sections of the process are much more reusable. In addition, the new Glue Contact operation allows you to mix and match different mesh types for different sections of a single part for more real-world performance. For example, consider a toggle switch that uses deformation to lock into certain positions. Now, while some portions of the component undergo large-scale deformations, the majority do not, so why run the whole thing as a non-linear (and inherently more complex) simulation? These new tools allow you to set up the component (with materials and loading conditions) and subdivide it into sections that undergo linear and nonlinear deformation. So, the job runs as a whole and with ease, but you’re conducting what would traditionally be a very complex multiphysics simulation. The simulation of sheet metal parts is of interest because of an increase in popularity, and NX6 introduces mid-plane modeling tools to assist in making it easier. Mid-plane modeling is a commonly used method of constructing thin-walled FEA models. When you have geometry where the mid plane is not readily apparent, gaps can occur. NX6 introduces tools that allow you to re-stitch, match, and merge edges to create a cohesive form that can be meshed. Some of the tools aren’t associative, but they get you most of the way there — assuming you don’t make massive topology changes and just need to clean things up.
Integrated 3D Search Standard components can be located and reused quickly or you might find similar parts that can be quickly adapted to your purpose. When combined with the ease of adapting existing geometry ST brings, you should see that the combined savings in time and effort can be huge. Oh, and it works with non-NX data too, so JT data, IGES, STEP, as well as data from other systems such as CATIA and SolidWorks, can be included in the search. We’ve barely scratched the surface of NX 6, but it should be clear that developers are continuing on an aggressive development schedule for the product and a system that’s very interesting in terms of modeling approaches. What’s interesting for me is that ST in the context of NX is much more exciting than it is in Solid Edge. I say that because NX has always enabled you to work with a wider selection of modeling methods and has always supported the ability to intelligently link part geometry to design intent on a granular level.
This is enhanced further and the system seems to be working in a more connected manner, offering better reuse capabilities and more flexible and free modeling. All this alongside, of course, the traditional parametric tools and the surface-based modeling tools that have been a mainstay of NX for years. With the NX Nastran solver as the foundation technology, Siemens offers accessible advanced simulation tools at the design stage. Then you get into the realm of production and manufacturing. NX has always had a rock-solid reputation in machining and mold design circles, purely because it’s one of the rare systems that combined advanced CAM functionality with supremely capable modeling tools adapted to that purpose for mold and die design. It’s clear that if you’re looking to adopt a product development and manufacturing system that really can cover everything from conceptualization to production and beyond, then NX is worthy of investigation. The introduction of Synchronous Technology means that the pains associated with learning a new design system are eased somewhat and that should drive new adoption by many. When NX is considered for its ability to capture everything that relates to intelligent product development, and that process, then it’s among the best systems currently available. More Info: Contributing Editor Al Dean is the editor at DEVELOP3D, a new UK product development and manufacturing technology journal. He divides his time between daydreaming about owning a 5-axis NC machine and having nightmares explaining its purchase to his family. Send comments about this article to DE-Editors@deskeng.com.
HOME | MCAD/CAM | ANALYSIS/SIMULATION | COMPUTERS/PERIPHERALS | RAPID TECHNOLOGIES | ABOUT US | PRIVACY POLICY | SITE MAP © 2009, Desktop Engineering, Design Engineering Technology News Magazine |
||||||||