![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Making Sense of Complex Applications: Part 2 More applications, more resources for multiphysics. | Published January 11, 2008 Part 1 of this two-part feature looking at multiphysics explored several state-of-the-art appplications incorporating two or more types of physical analysis.
Solving real-world problems often dictates the use of analysis software that handles more than one type of physics. This is imperative when the effects of coupling between different physical fields shouldn’t be ignored. Resolving these intricacies — thermal-structural, magnetic-structural, electrostatic-structural, piezoelectric, fluid-structural, and electromagnetic-heat transfer — poses a true challenge, but ever-evolving software developments are up to the task. Here, DE takes another look at companies improving their design understanding by incorporating two or more analysis types with electrical and medical applications. We also explore the resources available from NAFEMS, the international association for the engineering analysis community. Indirect Heating Coil Design High-frequency electric current flowing through a metal coil creates an alternating magnetic flux field. This flux stimulates a heating effect in an object placed in the center of the resulting field. Termed “induction coils,” such structures perform the useful task of indirect heating, but their successful design depends on understanding the effects of many parameters.
The physical properties of the system — thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, specific heat, density, and magnetic permeability — are all temperature-dependent, making such analysis problems non-trivial and introducing nonlinearity issues in simulations. However, the temperature that is produced is due to the electromagnetic inductance, which itself then changes with the new value of temperature. Thus, designers of induction coils need to iteratively solve a temperature-dependent electrical field and an inductance-introduced heat field to arrive at a solution. NISA software from Cranes Software allows users to set up an induction-coil model in its EMAG software using an axi-symmetric element. A typical example examines the interactions of a current in a copper coil that wraps around and heats a steel tube, all surrounded by air. The primary task is to solve the magnetodynamic equations coupled to those of thermal heat transfer. EMAG takes the effects of all three different materials into account, and solves the resulting equations iteratively. First, the software solves the magnetodynamic equations for a given temperature distribution and calculates the power density. It then uses this power as the heating source for the thermal calculations, which changes the temperature distribution, in turn changing the physical properties for the next round of magnetodynamics.
NISA EMAG outputs include color plots of flux densities, temperature distribution, stored electric energy, and magnetic vector potential. Analyzing Fluid Drug-Delivery Machanisms In the medical world, not all treatments come in pill form. Often a critical drug must be delivered directly into the source of the problem, but natural diffusion may take place too slowly for effective drug distribution. One promising approach being investigated for this problem is called convection enhanced delivery (CED).
In this method, drugs are infused using one or more special catheters that deliver the drug while maintaining a pressure gradient (convection) over one or more days. This technique allows the delivery of large molecules such as antibodies or immunotoxins as a bulk flow over a predetermined volume of distribution. Unfortunately, this task might take place under less than ideal patient conditions. In the case of brain injuries such as an ischemic (clogged blood vessel) stroke, the brain’s microstructure has been altered by cellular swelling and the condition decreases the fractional volume of available extracellular space where the drug would be diffusing. Peter Haar, a researcher at Virginia Commonwealth University, knows that for CED to be safe and effective, a physician must have accurate knowledge of how concentration distributions will be affected by catheter location, flow rate, patient anatomy, and other parameters. To investigate the accuracy of a proposed predictive model, Haar and his team conducted a study of infusion and diffusion of a drug (chemical species) in a rat brain (a porous medium). Using MRI images of rat-brain geometry, Haar’s team constructed a 3D triangulated surface as the basis for computed infusion models. They then worked with PORFLOW, a simulation package from Analytic & Computational Research, Inc. (ACRi) originally designed to model fluid convection and diffusion in rigid porous media such as rock and soil for pollutant transport analysis. Here, the software was used to analyze the flow of a drug through the brain. “Gray” and “white” matter in the brain have different material properties, so the model had to account for these differences while modeling dynamically coupled flow and mass transport. PORFLOW was able to handle anisotropic properties for each element over complex, irregular geometry, using a hybrid between finite element and finite difference methods. When compared to experimental data, the PORFLOW simulation results predicted concentration distributions following CED with an accuracy of 85 percent. Multiphysics Resources Through NAFEMS Sorting out the ever-changing options in multiphysics software and mathematical approaches requires users to stay current with the offerings and accomplishments of a great many software development companies. One way to do so is to tap into the knowledge at NAFEMS, headquartered in Glasgow, Scotland.
NAFEMS is an international organization, now with a strong North American regional community, that offers conferences, webinars, publications, and forums for exchanging current information and concerns about the use of computational analysis software. The group notes that in today’s design environment, engineers and designers who are neither specialists nor experts in analysis can greatly benefit from general information about common (and complicated) analysis issues. At NAFEMS.org, visitors will find a range of resources. The section called Analysis Terms A-Z offers a searchable database of common definitions of terms used for structural finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics, such as “coefficient of viscous damping” and “simultaneous vector iteration.” Under Knowledge Base is a series of articles that have run in NAFEM’s Benchmark magazine since October 2003; topics include Fundamentals of Numerical Techniques for Static, Dynamic and Transient Analyses and Nominal and Nonlinear Stresses. For purchase (at very reasonable member and non-member pricing), the website features more than 200 publications from brochures to books on a wide range of topics including nonlinear analysis, fracture mechanics, and benchmark tests. Specific to multiphysics, NAFEMS has led a number of efforts starting with a program called FENet begun in 2001 and aimed at coordinating activities in the European industrial finite element analysis community. Funded by the European Commission, the goal of the four-year FENet activity was to improve the quality of industrial applications and the level of confidence that can be placed in the computed results. In its very informative final Multiphysics Analysis report, the FENet group’s co-chairs, Mark Cross and Avril Slone of the University of Wales Swansea, provided a concise description of multi-physics capabilities: “Most CAE software vendors claim multiphysics capabilities, but in reality, what most of them offer at the present time [2005], is multi-disciplinarity, i.e. data generated by one code issued as input into another, either as boundary data or as a volume source, where the data transfer is one way. “This is distinguishable from full multiphysics analysis, which involves the two-way exchange of information, which could involve implicit convergence within a time-step. There is also an additional level of sophistication with regard to multiphysics, i.e., closely coupled multiphysics. This type of analysis adds ... complexity since both time- and space-accurate exchange of data is required.” Visit nafems.org/projects/fenet/technology/mpa/ for full results. Interest in multiphysics within NAFEMS is such that the organization has formed a Multiphysics Technical Group, with Slone as its chair, and more current software product information is being compiled. Recent activities have included the presentation of two webinars attracting more than 600 attendees each. These can be viewed and downloaded as PDF files free of charge at nafems.org/events/webinars/. More such webinars are planned, and in late 2008 in Norfolk, VA, NAFEMS will be hosting a North American regional conference, including multiphysics presentations. More Info: Analytic & Computational Research, Inc. (ACRi) Cranes Software (formerly NISA Software) NAFEMS North America Contributing Editor Pamela J. Waterman is an electrical engineer and freelance technical writer based in Arizona. You can contact her about this article via e-mail sent to DE-Editors@deskeng.com.
HOME | MCAD/CAM | ANALYSIS/SIMULATION | COMPUTERS/PERIPHERALS | RAPID TECHNOLOGIES | ABOUT US | PRIVACY POLICY | SITE MAP © 2009, Desktop Engineering, Design Engineering Technology News Magazine |
||||||||||||||||